mps-file-slew-of-questions-on-sph-media's-inflated-circulation-numbers-for-february-parliament-sitting
Spread the love

SINGAPORE: The inflation of SPH Media Trust’s circulation figures will get an airing in Parliament when it sits again on Feb 6, as members of Parliament (MPs) from various parties have filed questions on the issue.

SPH Media had said on Jan 9 that the daily circulation numbers of its titles were found to have been inflated by between 85,000 and 95,000, including instances where copies were printed, counted for circulation and then destroyed.

SPH Media is the publisher of newspapers including The Straits Times and Lianhe Zaobao.

The Workers’ Party posted its list of 17 parliamentary questions for the upcoming seating on its party Facebook page on Friday (Jan 20), seven of which are about SPH Media.

Among them is one from Ms He Ting Ru of Sengkang Group Representation Constituency (GRC), who asked the Minister for Communications and Information Josephine Teo whether those involved in initiating and perpetuating the inflation circulation figures have been referred to the police for further investigations. 

She also asked if there will be actions taken against SPH Media Trust to hold it accountable for the errors.

Fellow party member Gerald Giam of Aljunied GRC wanted to know the total number of newspaper copies that were printed, counted and destroyed by SPH Media or its predecessor company during the entire scheme. 

He also asked for the estimated total weight of paper used and the resultant environmental impact. 

People’s Action Party (PAP) MPs have also filed parliamentary questions on the issue, including Mr Darryl David, MP for Ang Mo Kio GRC. 

He asked Mrs Teo if the Government could provide insight from the internal report received from SPH Media regarding the alleged inconsistencies in their circulation data. 

He also wanted to know how these inconsistencies could impact the Government’s committment to fund the organisation. 

Meanwhile, Progress Singapore Party (PSP) has called for an independent inquiry into the case in a post on Facebook, adding that its non-constituency MPs will pursue this in Parliament to continue oversight over public expenditures.

Separately, on Friday, Mrs Teo told reporters in Davos — where she is attending the World Economic Forum — that the matter “will be addressed in Parliament and in due course”.

KEPPEL O&M CORRUPTION CASE TO GET AIRING TOO

Separately, WP MPs also filed 10 questions on the 2017 Keppel Offshore and Marine corruption case for the Feb 6 Parliament session.

The case involved six ex-senior management staff of Keppel O&M who had allegedly paid bribes amounting to about US$55 million (S$72 million) to officials of Brazilian state-owned oil giant Petrobras between 2001 and 2014. 

The Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) had issued stern warnings on Jan 11 to the six individuals, adding that they would not be charged or prosecuted. As such, they were not publicly named.

This was due to several factors, including the difficulties involved in getting evidence in a complex case involving multiple authorities and witnesses from several countries, the CPIB said.

But WP MPs are seeking more transparency on how the CPIB had arrived at this decision, as well as the reasons why the six individuals were not named. 

Mr Leon Perera of Aljunied GRC questioned if the decision not to prosecute the individuals represented a departure from the Government’s stated stance of zero tolerance towards corruption. 

Mr Dennis Tan, WP’s MP for Hougang, asked if it was in the public interest to disclose the names of the former employees while Mr Giam of Aljunied GRC asked if their ages and nationalities can be revealed. 

Meanwhile, Mr Louis Chua of Sengkang GRC also asked the Prime Minister which offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act 1960 had been considered for prosecution for the six individuals, as well as the maximum penalties for such offences. 

PAP MP for Jurong GRC Tan Wu Meng has also filed questions on the Keppel O&M saga, asking if the reasons for the warnings in lieu of prosecution can be elaborated upon and what is the assessed reputation damage to Singapore arising from the case.

Dr Tan has asked how many warnings and prosecutions the CPIB has initiated since 2000.

PSP FILES MOTION ON PUBLIC HOUSING

Public housing will also be on the agenda during the upcoming parliament seating. In a post uploaded on his personal Facebook page on Friday, PSP Non-Constituency MP Leong Mun Wai said that he has filed a motion on public housing. 

This comes after Senior Minister of State for National Development Sim Ann responded to Mr Leong’s online criticism on the prices of Build-to-Order flats by asking him to “go beyond social media posts” and “file a motion in Parliament” to formally discuss the issue in December last year. 

In his motion, he will call upon the Government to review its housing policies in order to deliver affordable Housing and Development Board flats, protect retirement adequacy and keep public housing inclusive, among other things, Mr Leong said.

“I hope that members on the other side of the House will debate in good faith on the real issues, instead of misrepresenting my arguments or casting aspersions on my motivations,” he wrote. 

This story was originally published in TODAY.